For many years there was only 1 dependable way to store information on a personal computer – using a disk drive (HDD). Nonetheless, this sort of technology is presently demonstrating it’s age – hard disks are really noisy and slow; they can be power–ravenous and tend to create a lot of heat throughout intensive procedures.

SSD drives, on the contrary, are quick, take in a lot less power and are also much cooler. They offer a whole new way of file access and storage and are years in advance of HDDs when considering file read/write speed, I/O efficiency and then energy efficiency. Figure out how HDDs fare up against the newer SSD drives.

1. Access Time

Image

Due to a revolutionary new approach to disk drive operation, SSD drives permit for considerably quicker file access speeds. With an SSD, file access instances are much lower (as small as 0.1 millisecond).

Image

HDD drives make use of rotating disks for data storage uses. When a file is being used, you will need to wait for the appropriate disk to reach the right place for the laser to access the data file involved. This ends in a typical access speed of 5 to 8 milliseconds.

2. Random I/O Performance

Image

The random I/O performance is really important for the functionality of any data file storage device. We’ve executed extensive lab tests and have determined that an SSD can manage at the very least 6000 IO’s per second.

Image

Throughout the same tests, the HDD drives demonstrated to be significantly slower, with simply 400 IO operations maintained per second. Even though this feels like a good deal, for those who have a hectic server that hosts numerous well–liked web sites, a slow hard disk can cause slow–loading sites.

3. Reliability

Image

SSD drives lack just about any moving parts, meaning that there is a lot less machinery included. And the less actually moving components you can find, the fewer the likelihood of failure are going to be.

The normal rate of failing of an SSD drive is 0.5%.

Image

HDD drives employ spinning hard disks for saving and reading info – a concept dating back to the 1950s. With hard disks magnetically suspended in the air, rotating at 7200 rpm, the prospects of something failing are much bigger.

The standard rate of failure of HDD drives can vary amongst 2% and 5%.

4. Energy Conservation

Image

SSDs don’t have moving parts and need minimal chilling energy. In addition they demand not much power to operate – tests have shown that they can be operated by a normal AA battery.

As a whole, SSDs use up somewhere between 2 and 5 watts.

Image

As soon as they were designed, HDDs have always been quite power–ravenous products. And when you’ve got a server with a bunch of HDD drives, this will boost the month–to–month electricity bill.

Typically, HDDs consume in between 6 and 15 watts.

5. CPU Power

Image

The quicker the data accessibility speed is, the swifter the file calls are going to be treated. Consequently the CPU do not need to hold allocations waiting for the SSD to answer back.

The average I/O delay for SSD drives is merely 1%.

Image

When compared with SSDs, HDDs allow for not so quick data file access speeds. The CPU will need to wait around for the HDD to come back the inquired data, reserving its resources in the meanwhile.

The standard I/O wait for HDD drives is around 7%.

6.Input/Output Request Times

Image

In real life, SSDs perform as wonderfully as they performed throughout the testing. We ran a complete platform back up using one of our production servers. All through the backup operation, the common service time for any I/O queries was indeed under 20 ms.

Image

Compared with SSD drives, HDDs offer significantly reduced service rates for input/output requests. In a server backup, the regular service time for any I/O request ranges between 400 and 500 ms.

7. Backup Rates

Image

One more real–life improvement will be the rate at which the backup was created. With SSDs, a hosting server data backup today requires under 6 hours using Webpaz’s server–optimized software solutions.

Image

In contrast, with a server with HDD drives, an identical backup will take three to four times as long to finish. An entire back up of an HDD–powered web server may take 20 to 24 hours.

If you want to quickly boost the effectiveness of your web sites and never having to adjust any kind of code, an SSD–driven hosting service is really a good alternative. Have a look at Webpaz’s cloud hosting services packages as well as our VPS web hosting services – these hosting services have fast SSD drives and can be found at competitive prices.


  • Service guarantees

  •  
  • Webpaz’s Virtual Private Servers come with no setup fees and function in a steady network delivering 99.9% of uptime. Full admin server access warranted.
  • Compare our prices

  •  
  • Examine the tools and characteristics coming with our Virtual Private Servers. You can start with a cheaper VPS Web Hosting setup and move up with simply a click as your necessities expand.
  • Compare our hosting plans
  • Contact Us

  •  
  • We are available for you day and night to reply to any sort of questions regarding our VPS Web Hosting solutions. 60–min response time frame guarantee.